Apr
29
Which political party should I join?
Filed Under Politics | 12 Comments
I do not know which party to join, but I consider myself a Christian Democrat. Here are some of my view points.
Abortion: I believe in making abortion legal only in a situation where the woman would die. I however, would not do this unless adoption agencies, health care for children, easy access to education for the child, child care, and family planning organizations were easier to access or can be provided by the government.
Education: Support early childhood education, college tuition, and reward better teachers. Also I think everyone should have a chance at a great education.
Energy: I believe in making sure we replace our dependence on oil with clean coal, solar, wind, bio fuel, water, and other forms of energy that can be renewed.
Free Trade: I support Fair Trade to make sure we do not lose jobs, workers, or are disadvantaged more than what we gain.
Gun Control: I believe in stricter registration laws that make sure the person who buys a gun hasn’t committed a felony in the past 20 years and the person can be trusted with a gun. I do believe people should have the right to defend themselves.
Heath Care: I believe in supporting health care in a way very similar to Barack Obama.
Homeland Security: I would revise the Patriot Act so it won’t violate peoples rights as much.
LGBT Rights: I oppose marriage and civil unions for gays, but I believe they should be able to see each other in the hospital.
Social Secruity: I believe that some social secruity should be private so that people can choose what they want to invest in.
Stem cell research: I oppose stem cell research.
Taxes: I believe in progressive tax policies to tax higher on the rich and lower on the middle class.
Foreign Policy: I believe we should try to get support from the UN for wars, but if we don’t, I think we should still keep it an option. I also believe in trying to be a lot more peaceful than warbound. I believe that going to Iraq was a mistake because a civil war was likely to happen either way.
WILLIS
Apr
25
A fascinating insight to the secrets of Stan Meyer’s patents, and the principals behind the water fuel cell, David Wenbert, from the H2Earth Institute discusses the device in detail. This interview, along with the PES Moray King interview shed a bright light into this device, which is normally a high efficiency / over unity electrolyzer / capacitor, but when coupled with the Electron Extraction circuit, the device pulls off the free electrons in the charged HHO gas, making it a true fuel cell, plus a gas generator.
Everyone knows we need to get off fossil fuels, and we need to do it quickly. Global warming aside, the air & water pollution from other toxins in fossil fuels is killing the planet. Add to this, we’ve gone through half the world’s crude supply in 100 years. China & India’s economies are now bursting online and mimicking the U.S. model. We’ll go through the last oil reserves in less than 50 years at the rate of consumption and projected demands.
650 coal plants are planned in China & India in 10 Yrs, doubling GHG emissions. In light of peak oil & exhausting the crude oil supply in 50 years, & the air & water pollution from petrochemicals, we need to transition to a new fuel source that can (1) Be burned in the ~1 Billion global internal combustion engines with minimal modifications (2) Not pollute the atmosphere with byproducts that damage the environment.
The most popular candidate for a non polluting energy for transportation has always been hydrogen. But the infrastructure for producing & storing hydrogen doesn’t exist & will be costly. Plus you don’t want to produce CO2 during the water electrolysis process, or via steam iron absorbing process. Using solar, wind or clean energy for the electrolysis is essential. You don’t want to make clean energy using dirty energy. Biofuels like sweet sorghum can help too.
Conventional electrolysis to produce separated gasses of H & O takes a great amount of energy compared to the return from burning it in an engine/generator. You’re lucky if you get 30% efficiency. Plus storage of the hydrogen gas is tricky and huge tanks are needed, unless liquefied, which takes a third more hydrogen energy to liquefy. In light of this, a way to electrolyze water and make more gas with less energy is critical to having in onboard water-top-fuel scenario.
The long time dream of filling your car with water & an efficient electrolyzer making a combustible gas from the water is under our noses. The answer is with the Water Fuel Cell. Although, unlike a traditional fuel cell, which mixes gasses & generates electricity, the water fuel cell produces gas from very little energy. An additional circuit called the Electron Extraction Circuit produces a current by pulling off the free electrons in the water gas (HHO), making it a true water fuel cell.
The water fuel cell produces a charged gas of diatomic & monatomic hydrogen & oxygen atoms, and free electrons. In traditional electrolysis the gasses are separated, and an acidic catalyst is added, which must be filtered out of the hydrogen gas. With the water fuel cell, it can turn any water source (such as salt water) into HHO gas. You can weld with it and cut through just about anything. The gas is used for SCUBA. If burned against nuclear waste, the waste is rendered inert.
HHO gas can power most internal combustion engines. When you burn the gas, it turns back into water! It’s the perfect solution to transportation fuel. The electrolyzers that make this gas can be purchased online at the Hydrogen Garage Store, National Vapor, Arizona Hydrogen, or get an HHO welder at Aquygen ( hytechapps (dot) com. OR Google Bob Boyce D9 PDF and build your own.
For those who are developing their own clean energy and zero-point energy systems, or for those who would like to be involved with this promotion, please visit:
http://www.theorionproject.org
RORY
Apr
22
I watched a documentary on hydrogen cars, and am now very interested in the future of cars. Later, however i got into an intense argument with my dad about it; he’s a BIG skeptic. He said that because nothing is 100 percent energy efficient plus we can never truly create energy, simply by putting water into a car would never work! I argued that gasoline, by that logic, wouldn’t make cars run. He said that gasoline is made by enormous amount of energy and can therefore release that energy by simply lighting it. I understand that water, unlike gasoline, is not an energy carrier and to make energy carrier (hydrogen) from requires energy itself. so can hydrogen fuel cell really work?
LUKE
Apr
19
Did you know it takes over 1,000 gallons of water to make 1 gallon of Ethanol?
Filed Under Other - Politics & Government | 12 Comments
Insert from the Rocky Mountain News on August 24, 2007
David Pimentel, a professor at Cornell University known for his research in alternative fuels, denounces corn-based ethanol. He is among the critics who say production of one gallon of ethanol uses more than a thousand gallons of water.
Just read this article
http://climate.weather.com/articles/nebraska081007.html
WILLARD
Apr
17
water as 50% replacement for fuel
Filed Under Tech | Leave a Comment
specially prepared ionized water can make perfect Water-Fuel 50/50 emulsion,
and such Water-Fuel Emulsion called as FUKAI-EMULSION can save
35-50% of fuel for boilers, jet engines, etc. FUKAI-EMULSION can also reduce
NOX & SOX CO2 in exhaust gas up to 75%. (more) (less)
WILEY















