turn salt water into fire !

fuel cell automobile

25 Responses to “Water Fuel 1 of 4”

1. kakkakakkapylly on May 24th, 2010 2:58 pm

   hydrogen alternative fuel

   And what is the frequency(range) to separate hydrogen and oxygen? With more knowledge we could build those generators and try it out ourselves. Or is is just a hoax?

2. RedPhoenix2000 on May 25th, 2010 12:57 pm

   can i run my car on water

   Yeah… but how many of us have access to an RF generator…

3. mtssvnsn on May 26th, 2010 4:20 am

   running a car on water

   So its actually just regular plain ol *saltwater* that is burning, not hydrogen made out of water and electricity?
   The energy comes from the *water* not the electricity?
   No?
   Then shut the hell up about saltwater as fuel.

   With this way of reasoning we could also use regular stones as cheap food.
   Just put boil regulate stones with meat vegetables and spices, and you get delicious nutritious soup.

   Just imagine could feed the whole world for free on stones!

4. mynycontact on May 29th, 2010 12:21 am

   car with water

   IThere is no need to use salt water when we have wind, solar , magnets and compressed air as alternative energy sources.

5. mynycontact on May 30th, 2010 6:54 am

   making hydrogen gas

   Future plans suggest drivers will be tax on the per mile basis regardless of fuel source via a special GPS system. This is why you are starting to see greater acceptance of alternative technologies begin to rise. The good news is that you won’t pollute the environment which may improve health but their is no escaping the power players.

6. nibus9 on June 1st, 2010 6:29 pm

   device fuel saving

   invention is nothing but the realisation of an already existing possibility [ in this case in our system/dimension etc ]

7. DJReignX on June 3rd, 2010 5:11 am

   car fuel economy

   It sure could impact the entire world…What’s the difference between the salt water in that test tube on fire…or the whole ocean? Let’s just pray there’s no way to do that from space on any of our oceans.

8. L2thePz on June 4th, 2010 7:31 pm

   gas mileage rating

   so does that mean we will run out off salt water?? lol well the planet is coverd with 2/3 of it

9. BugNuggets on June 5th, 2010 1:14 am

   hydrogen as fuel

   Actually nukes are horribly inefficient weapons, far from being overunity. That majority of fissible material is unreacted during the process.

   You provide a detailed procedure for any over-unity reaction/process and I’ll gladly set-up the experiment, setting up laboratory work is what I do for a living, been in the business for almost 20 years.

10. energyismass on June 6th, 2010 12:29 pm

    fuel cells

    Ever hear of anti gravity? Not possible, broken all time by silent craft floating around. A nuke is an overunity weapon. You know it, I know it. What the fark do we know? WE Don’t know ****. You act like the authority on the subject, you don’t know ****. You only know what you been told, you ever do anything experimental? or do you just blab your pesimestic pie hole all day long in this forum? Deventurd and Buttnuggets act like farken shills.

11. energyismass on June 6th, 2010 3:11 pm

    gas additives

    Come on over, we’ll make a billion together.

12. BugNuggets on June 7th, 2010 5:41 pm

    hho technology

    Well I guess there’s your chance to become a billionaire! The world uses over 100M lbs of hydrogen a year, most of it coming from hydrocarbon reductions. With your expertise in extracting it cheaply you should be a billionaire many times over in a matter of months.

13. energyismass on June 9th, 2010 1:35 pm

    cheapest gas

    hydrogen is the fuel and you can ***** water easily with much less energy than your told. No overunity proven, just an effecient way to access hydrogen for fuel.

14. BugNuggets on June 12th, 2010 11:16 pm

    gas saving tips

    If your getting out more energy then your putting in how are laws of physics not broken?

    Your statements contradict each other.

15. energyismass on June 14th, 2010 1:13 am

    improve mpg

    No laws broken in physics here, just an easier more effecient way to access the hydrogen in water, which is great, beacause we are alwasys told it take more energy than what it can produce. Thats bull. Water as fuel is totally viable if cracked effeciently. There are many low powered tricks to break that bond instead of great amounts raw power to ***** water. 13.56 mhz 9.26 mhz

16. mzhang19 on June 14th, 2010 7:39 am

    improve fuel economy

    Please check my other video of collections of other water fuel technology has been developed.

17. BugNuggets on June 17th, 2010 7:48 am

    hydrogen diesel

    Okay, I found the article you mentioned plus others and I noticed two things.

    1. Their discussing laws of nature which are typically things like constants (pi, c, etc), not laws of physics are based on more interaction.

    2. The method of presentation. These videos show no evidence and basically claim they might have invalidated everything we know of physics. BBC group shows lots of evidence and then explains in detail that it’s not proven yet and what more is needed.

    See a difference?

18. BugNuggets on June 18th, 2010 1:55 am

    water to gas

    Nothing I wrote implies I think we have found all the laws of physics. I simply stated the “laws” we currently have are based on the most fundamental of observations.

    And as these videos are proof of, news broadcasts are hardly the source you want to quote when discussing science.

19. mzhang19 on June 20th, 2010 8:36 am

    suv fuel economy

    Please check a news from BBC back to May 2002, title “Laws of physics ‘may change’”, and please read it you will surprise how little we know the universe. If you think we have already know every laws of physics, think again.

20. BugNuggets on June 21st, 2010 11:19 pm

    hydrogen cars

    Can you point out a single accepted law of physics that has been broken in the last 100 years? Just one?

21. BugNuggets on June 22nd, 2010 2:41 am

    compare gas mileage

    That pretty much just means theres more laws to write, not that those discovered are invalid. Laws in science are based on the most basic of observations. If you had even a minor understanding of them you’d be more like “Duh, why did they even bother to state that it’s so obvious”.

22. mzhang19 on June 24th, 2010 1:22 pm

    cost of hydrogen

    Yes. Laws is written by men, men has limited point of views, therefore the laws can only apply to certain area, not all. REMEMBER! all invention start with breaking some wellknown laws. How many time of human change and update the laws in the past 100 years? there was a lot, and there will not end just now, it will keeps changing, and keep improving.

23. proverb311031 on June 25th, 2010 10:07 pm

    hydrogen plans

    Those laws mean nothing because we act as if we know everything, when we clearly only know one billionth one one percent of the mysteries of the Universe!

24. thezenofsurf on June 29th, 2010 9:25 am

    gas4free ebook

    Gov Grant?????This guy needs 24 hour protection from the Gov. You have to have a death wish to invent something thats going to challenge big oil. They (oil) poisoned the poor ******* that invented the water powered engine. This guy is next if he isn’t careful.Screw the patents, he needs to go live voyercam worldwide 24/7 so if he does get offed his secrets dont die w/him and big oil doesn’t buy the pattents and lose’em.

25. dapple33 on July 2nd, 2010 1:56 pm

    water trailers

    The law of the conservation of energy is not in question in this case because mass could be sacrificed in a chemical reaction. A small amount of energy in the form of radio waves would merely provide a means of producing hydrogen witch in turn is burned for more energy than it takes to produce the radio waves. This is not some perpetual motion machine because a complex chemical reaction is present.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.