Dec
18
Water Fuel Cell by Xogen
Filed Under Tech
mattimber asked:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Xogen_Technologies_Inc
For those who are developing their own clean energy and zero-point energy systems, or for those who would like to be involved with this promotion, please visit:
http://www.theorionproject.org
VITO
LEWIS
No no, you’re right yo43, they were totally bought out.
LAVERN
This is awesome! What a cool video, I hope they make it available and affordable for everyone today.
MARCOS
I like the container, very clean design. Output is okay, I have cells that have higher output levels.
TRINIDAD
You’re flat-out wrong. Do your research.
RUSTY
xogen is gone.. i heard they were bought out! the web page is gone too….
MATHEW
the same thing happened to all of my plants last year when we had a hurricane. all of the grass on my lawn died when the waves got on it.
MERLE
There could also have been a buildup of free electrons in the water and it formed an electromagnetic dipolarity in the water, and this may have literally shocked the plants by upsettng the pH or electrolytic properties. Maybe the addition of a Meyer Electron Extraction Circuit would make a difference in the water’s properties. The presence or abcence of a Pulse Width Modulator could also yield simialr or varied results. The water may kill plants initially, but may also mitigate radiated soil.
HORACE
Thanks for the info. I couldn’t say what the water has in it after the resonance breakdown of the water in a HHO generator. If you used tap water & brute force DC, then some gas was created and I assume vented in the air. If you used a catalyst like baking soda, or perhaps impurities in the tap water could leave behind byproducts that affected the plants. If you used distilled water and a good PWM like the Bob Boyce design, I’d imagine the water would be different, but this requires testing.
OLIVER
Now this maybe a daft question.
If we are removing oxygen & hydrogen from water what is left, maybe dead water if so this has the potential to contaminate the water table. My test was, 10 plants in pots, 5 were watered from a used sell (tap water only), 5 plants watered from the tap, the 5 watered from a sell all suffered. Well that was my results after running the same test 3 times on 30 plants. But Im not a gardener.
KEVEN
5 ?????
HOBERT
There are others out there besides Xogen that can make this technology in mass. It’s based on Stan Meyer’s patents, which have expired. Xogen’s patents focus on the specific driver and freqency, but there’s many ways to make HHO and do it in an over-unity senario.
HHO gas shows many promising applications including nuclear waste mitigation and water purification - not to mention creating on-demand fuel for any car or truck, or using it for electrical energy.
NAPOLEON
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE promise humanity that you will not sell out to major energy companies who have an interest in killing this technology!!!! They buy the patent and never develop or bring it to market.
RAPHAEL
asuuu que vacan
OLEN
If you do it right, you can create more HHO gas that what Faraday said was possible (in terms of hydrogen production).The trick is to use high voltage pulses and restrict current flow. Voltage is faster than current.
The Xogen system is not unlike other technology including the Joe Cell, and Stan Meyer Water Fuel Cell.Each varies on efficiency.Some (not Xogen) tout a 600% efficiency.Xogen hasnt released specifics regarding efficiencies.
Check out my videos with Moray King & David Wenbert
RICK
how much power is needed to ***** water in this procedure? how much energy(heat and electricity) is produced? is this the most efficient way to use the input power
does the waste/dirty water clog plates or change the yield
MARIA
so why only Views: 11,883 ? why not 1,000,000? h2 sent people to the moon. so why not the video store ? they say this is not safe but what realy is safe a motercycle is safe but not hho gas? one last thing normal gas for your car is 87 octan but h2 gas is 130 octan what does this mean? it means lots better miles per gallon or drag raceing. do you feel safe now i know i dont but if you do thats good. we are slaves.
LUIGI
I stand corrected. Either way it goes they are using these multitrillions to keep us enslaved to energy that is slowly killing this planet and us. The more I learn about this the more I realize man is pretty stupid.
SHELTON
uh sag,that’s actually “Multitrillion’s of dollars”.
VICTOR
Actually the Xogen system can be credited to Stephen Chambers, US Patent 6,790,324 (2004). It uses pulsed square waves at 10 — 250 KHz. Meyer’s device was similar, but the electronics were analog and the frequencies were manually set and changed.
RICHIE
This is a Stanley Meyers Work. But at least someone is gitting it out.
LEE
If more time was spent researching zero-point energy & less time arguing about things hard to prove (e.g. power elites), it would help push this vital technology further. Check out the transcribed interviews I have with Moray King & David Wenbert. Dr. Tom Valone is another great source who works with these technologies, as well as Dr. Steven Greer. Google: “hydrogen-gas-hybrid HOD” to see an HHO booster kit (also contact installations). Search “National Vapor,” or “Water4Gas (dot) com.
LANNY
QuantumFieldBoy: I can see you don’t know you are a slave in the system. So you say to me: “Take your tin foil hat talk elseware. There is no “royal elite”". Well I could say take your ignorance else where but I reconize your right to be insulting, ignorant, and stupid. When you prove to me you own youtube then I might consider your proposal to take my point of view else where. Until then you are stuck with the like of us that see the world as it really is.
RUDY
It doesn’t matter if the scientific community is skeptical or not. If there was no force to suppress these new technologies the inventors would build their ideas without the blessing of the closed minded Scientist. It is you Quantunfieldboy that is the irrational mind here. Change has been slow in the past but today change is happening at much faster pace in technology. I will say this: skeptism is being priced right of the market today. Given the tone of your post I can see you are just a boy.
PRESTON
Take your tin foil hat talk elseware. There is no “royal elite”, the inertia of adapting such scientific methods is due to the skeptical nature of the scientific community, and the even MORE skeptical nature of the business community. Change is always slow, there are always vested interests in maintaining the status quo. Deal with these facts like a rational human for f***’s sake.
SANTIAGO
Type: “Stanley Meyer - System Explained” this is a lecture with an excelent explaination for the process.